Abstract:
While much attention is paid to urban development and to what is being built in general,
much lesser notice has been given to the opposite phenomenon. While some cities are
growing rapidly, many others are experiencing a population decline for various reasons.
These include economic, environmental, and social changes to which urban societies and
structures have to adapt. Significant outflow of population and decreasing population
density are symptoms of these cities’ structural crisis. As a result, local urban centers are
reorganized and parts of residential districts are demolished. The paper analyzes the
neighborhoods of selected European cities in which a significant demolition of residential
structures has taken place over the last 30 years and seeks to find the parameters that
characterize the affected areas and embody the nature of „what and why“ we demolish in
our cities today. On the other hand, it is looking for characteristics that make these places
different from one another. It also compares resulting quality of the respective areas after
their adaptation to the new situation. The paper focuses mainly (but not only) on the physical
impact of shrinkage on the selected cities structures and seeks for evidence and reasons of
different vigour of studied phenomenon in diverse neighborhoods of cities. We achieve it
through comparing variables related to shrinkage in 3 selected European cities. The selected
variables are demographic (population trends), spatial (demolition rates, distribution within
the city relative to the urban structure) and specific local conditions (urban policies,
ownership). The comparison shows a wide range of conceptualised approaches to
shrinkage, with housing tenure and the openness of urban policies to shrinkage emerging as
key factors, although it should be noted that even these do not always lead to clearly better
results, as the problem of shrinkage is not purely urban based and thus cannot be solved by
purely urban planning methods.