Comparison of residual shear strength determined by different methods

DSpace Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Aysegul Bayin; Faculty of Civil Engineering, Istanbul Technical University
dc.contributor.author Mustafa Hatipoglu; Faculty of Civil Engineering, Istanbul Technical University
dc.contributor.author Gokhan Cevikbilen; Faculty of Civil Engineering, Istanbul Technical University
dc.contributor.author Recep Iyisan; Faculty of Civil Engineering, Istanbul Technical University
dc.date 2013-06-14 09:07:23
dc.date.accessioned 2013-07-15T11:48:51Z
dc.date.accessioned 2015-11-23T16:09:59Z
dc.date.available 2013-07-15T11:48:51Z
dc.date.available 2015-11-23T16:09:59Z
dc.date.issued 2013-07-15
dc.identifier http://ecs.epoka.edu.al/index.php/iscce/iscce2012/paper/view/600
dc.identifier.uri http://dspace.epoka.edu.al/handle/1/666
dc.description.abstract The shear stress of stiff or dense soils increases with the displacement and reaches itsmaximum value, and then shear stress decreases and remains a constant value. The minimumand constant shear stress of soils reached at large shear displacements is called as residualshear strength. Residual shear strength generally has a great importance in design ofengineering structures constructed on fissured overconsolidated clays and long-term slopestability analysis in geotechnical engineering. In laboratory testing, modeling the residualconditions of a soil requires large shear displacements attained in drained conditions.Reversal direct shear test (RDS), consolidated-drained triaxial test (CD) and torsional ringshear test (RS) are the widely used testing methods to determine residual shear strengthparameters. These methods have some advantages or limitations when compared with eachother. In this study, residual shear strength parameters of soil samples having different clayfractions were determined by the three different drained tests, the results were compared, andeffect of the testing methods on residual shear strength was investigated. The variation ofresidual shear strength angle versus liquid limit and plasticity index were studied. The resultswere compared with previous studies. As a result, it is found that the residual shear strengthangle determined by the ring shear test is lower than the others, and the residual shear strengthangle decreases with the increasing liquid limit and plasticity index.
dc.format application/pdf
dc.language en
dc.publisher International Student Conference of Civil Engineering
dc.rights Authors who submit to this conference agree to the following terms:<br /> <strong>a)</strong> Authors retain copyright over their work, while allowing the conference to place this unpublished work under a <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">Creative Commons Attribution License</a>, which allows others to freely access, use, and share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and its initial presentation at this conference.<br /> <strong>b)</strong> Authors are able to waive the terms of the CC license and enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution and subsequent publication of this work (e.g., publish a revised version in a journal, post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial presentation at this conference.<br /> <strong>c)</strong> In addition, authors are encouraged to post and share their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) at any point before and after the conference.
dc.source International Student Conference of Civil Engineering; International Student Conference of Civil Engineering
dc.title Comparison of residual shear strength determined by different methods
dc.type Peer-reviewed Paper


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account