Abstract:
This paper examines the European integration trajectories of Albania and North Macedonia from 2001 to 2025, analyzing how two neighboring Western Balkan countries with shared strategic objectives have experienced distinct pathways toward European Union accession. Using a comparative and qualitative approach, the study investigates institutional preparedness, political reform processes, regional diplomacy, and the impact of the EU’s conditionality framework. North Macedonia’s journey, initiated with the signing of the Stabilization and Association Agreement in 2001, has been repeatedly hindered by bilateral disputes, identity politics, and internal political instability. Albania, while avoiding major external blockages, has faced persistent challenges related to governance, corruption, and the rule of law, which have slowed its reform momentum. Despite shared participation in regional initiatives such as the Berlin Process and alignment with the Western Balkans enlargement agenda, the two cases illustrate how similar starting points can lead to divergent outcomes. The findings demonstrate that the interplay between domestic reform capacity and external conditionality has determined each country’s pace and depth of integration. Furthermore, the study argues that geographical proximity and similar policy aspirations are insufficient predictors of harmonized European futures. Instead, political will, institutional stability, and the credibility of EU incentives remain decisive factors. By tracing both successes and setbacks across two decades, the paper provides a deeper understanding of how structural conditions, geopolitical dynamics, and EU engagement shape the transformative power of Europeanization in the Western Balkans. We find ourselves witnessing achievements, failures, and expectations that belong not only to the citizens but also to civil society, the academic sphere, diverse communities, institutions, and the collective consciousness. In the persistent wait for the overcoming of bilateral disputes, there is a prevailing sense that not only is the region advancing at divergent paces, but that the EU itself appears inconsistent and without a harmonized voice regarding the issues of consensus and decision-making.
